Neural network dynamics.
By Tim P. Vogels, Kanaka Rajan, L. F. Abbott. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2005
514 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f95965317ff415fa830e6873eda9209c3bec5b3f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Olaf Sporns
- Friedemann Zenke
- Surya Ganguli
- Xiao-Jing Wang
- Catie Chang
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Gustavo Deco
- Andreas Knoblauch
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Friedemann Zenke
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Andreas Knoblauch
- Surya Ganguli
- Edgar Körner
- Nicolas Frémaux
- Tim P. Vogels
- John M. Beggs
Citations in the corpus
- The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing (2008, methodology): “Here, we will describe in more detail a critical branching process model (Harris 1989; Beggs & Plenz 2003; Haldeman & Beggs 2005; reviewed by Vogels et al. 2005), because it captures the power-law distribution of avalanche sizes and the reproducible activity sequences seen in the data.”
- Rhythms of the brain (2006, background): “Von der Malsburg (1985). 15. Goldstone (1998) discusses the literature on the ability of trained observers to recognize orders of magnitude more features than untrained subjects.”
- From the neuron doctrine to neural networks (2015, background): “…methods to measure multi-neuronal activity in vitro or in vivo 14,149,178–180 or to analyse and model multidimensional and dynamical activity 37,109,181 may usher in a Kuhnian ‘scientific revolution’ 36 , in which the single-neuron doctrine taught in text-books is replaced by a new neural network…”
- Balanced amplification: a new mechanism of selective amplification of neural activity patterns (2009, unknown): “When neural circuits operate in a regime in which synchronization of spiking of different neurons is weak, many aspects of their behavior can be understood from simple models of neuronal firing rates (Ermentrout, 1998; Pinto et al., 1996; Brunel, 2000; Vogels et al., 2005).”
- Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations (2013, background): “Simultaneous EEG–fMRI— Scalp EEG offers a non-invasive, electrophysiological window into endogenous shifts in “brain states.””
- Synaptic Plasticity in Neural Networks Needs Homeostasis with a Fast Rate Detector (2013, background): “Theoretically, the background state is currently understood as the asynchronous and irregular (AI) firing regime resulting from a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition in recurrent neural networks [6–9].”
- Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings (2014, background): “To make this concept concrete, consider a hypothetical neural circuit as a dynamical system, in the sense that the activity of its constituent neurons changes over time 30 .”
- How advances in neural recording affect data analysis (2011, methodology): “As the number of simultaneously recorded neurons grows, models that have traditionally only been tested using large-scale neural simulations will be able to access large, comparable dataset”
- Dynamical principles in neuroscience (2006, unknown): “These results include the description of the diversity of dynamics in single neurons and synapses Koch, 1999; Vogels et al., 2005 , the spatiotemporal cooperative dynamics of small groups of neurons with different types of connections Selverston et al., 2000; Selverston, 2005 , and the principles…”
- Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques (2013, background): “In fact, the results from converging methods have implied that the intrinsic neural and hemodynamic fluctuations represent an essential property of normal brain functioning [for reviews see Bullock, 2003; Ringach, 2009, 2010; Sadaghiani et al., 2010; Vogels et al., 2005].”