How advances in neural recording affect data analysis

By Ian H. Stevenson, Konrad Paul Kording. Nature Neuroscience, 2011

622 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Over the last five decades, progress in neural recording techniques has allowed the number of simultaneously recorded neurons to double approximately every 7 years, mimicking Moore's law. Such exponential growth motivates us to ask how data analysis techniques are affected by progressively larger numbers of recorded neurons. Traditionally, neurons are analyzed independently on the basis of their tuning to stimuli or movement. Although tuning curve approaches are unaffected by growing numbers of simultaneously recorded neurons, newly developed techniques that analyze interactions between neurons become more accurate and more complex as the number of recorded neurons increases. Emerging data analysis techniques should consider both the computational costs and the potential for more accurate models associated with this exponential growth of the number of recorded neurons.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c58d3a01bd28e4a202d420346ec0a745db3414e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. Mikhail A. Lebedev
  2. Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
  3. Krishna V. Shenoy
  4. Carlos Pedreira
  5. H. Rey
  6. R. Quian Quiroga
  7. Stephen I. Ryu
  8. Stephanie Nelli

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Mikhail A. Lebedev
  2. Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
  3. Krishna V. Shenoy
  4. Jörn Diedrichsen
  5. Christopher Summerfield
  6. Andrew M. Saxe
  7. Surya Ganguli
  8. Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

Citations in the corpus