BEYOND DICHOTOMY: THE CURVILINEAR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

By Michael L. Barnett. 2018

1,078 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9429b50ef05bfe89fb558d48b187d92233b2a37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Operational Productivity, Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance, and Risk in Manufacturing Firms (2016, background): “Given that Barnett and Salomon (2006, 2012) hypothesize and demonstrate the effect of CSP on FP to be curvilinear, we must consider potential curvilin-ear effects in our analyses.”
Sustainable development and financial system: IntegratingESGrisks through sustainable investment strategies in a climate change context (2021, methodology): “Focusing on how it relates to the intensity and types of screens used, Barnett and Salomon (2006) and Capelle-Blancard & Monjon (2014) find a curvilinear relationship. Admitting that the use of different screens can lead to different performance patterns and investment styles, Trinks & Scholtens (20”
Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe (2019, background): “Therefore, long-term planning is necessary, so that any investments in socially responsible behaviours result in beneficial outcomes to shareholders [47,48].”
Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea (2016, result): “The study of Barnett and Salomon (2006, 2012) in finance also suggested that firms with a higher CSR index score have better performance compared to those with a lower CSR score.”
A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Socially Responsible Funds (2019, background): “Finally, the yellow cluster was the smallest, with 10 papers, and contained influential papers about modern portfolio theory, such as Markowitz [68] or Sharpe [69], and portfolio selection of socially responsible investments [34,44,70]”
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector (2018, background): “…through engaging in charity projects, supporting and promoting staff welfare and minimising environmental damage can be expensive and give rise to an administrative burden (Barnett and Salomon 2006, p. 1103); therefore, it is argued that CSR activities create ﬁnancial burdens for corporations.”
Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities? (2013, unknown): “…had a positive impact on CFP, other types of social dimensions, such as employee and environmental, had a negative effect on the market-based CFP.13 Barnett and Salomon (2006) pointed out that a limitation of their study is the use of one single marketbased measure of CFP, instead of an…”
A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, background): “…specifies the risks associated with positive social performance feedback, including social performance investments exceeding financial efficiency (Barnett & Salomon, 2006) and increased likelihood of future violations of stakeholder expectations (Graffin, Bundy, Porac, Wade, & Quinn,…”