THE MOST METAL-POOR STARS. IV. THE TWO POPULATIONS WITH [Fe/H] ≲ −3.0

By J. Norris, David Yong, M. Bessell, N. Christlieb, Martin Asplund, G. Gilmore, R. Wyse, Timothy C. Beers, Paul Barklem, A. Frebel and 1 more. 2012

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We discuss the carbon-normal and carbon-rich populations of Galactic halo stars having [Fe/H] ≲ −3.0, utilizing chemical abundances from high-resolution, high signal-to-noise model-atmosphere analyses. The C-rich population represents ∼28% of stars below [Fe/H] = −3.1, with the present C-rich sample comprising 16 CEMP-no stars, and two others with [Fe/H] ∼ −5.5 and uncertain classification. The population is O-rich ([O/Fe] ≳ +1.5); the light elements Na, Mg, and Al are enhanced relative to Fe in half the sample; and for Z > 20 (Ca) there is little evidence for enhancements relative to solar values. These results are best explained in terms of the admixing and processing of material from H-burning and He-burning regions as achieved by nucleosynthesis in zero-heavy-element models in the literature of “mixing and fallback” supernovae (SNe); of rotating, massive, and intermediate-mass stars; and of Type II SNe with relativistic jets. The available (limited) radial velocities offer little support for the C-rich stars with [Fe/H] < −3.1 being binary. More data are required before one could conclude that binarity is key to an understanding of this population. We suggest that the C-rich and C-normal populations result from two different gas cooling channels in the very early universe of material that formed the progenitors of the two populations. The first was cooling by fine-structure line transitions of C ii and O i (to form the C-rich population); the second, while not well defined (perhaps dust-induced cooling?), led to the C-normal group. In this scenario, the C-rich population contains the oldest stars currently observed.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f933fa60a565cae5e185d71991629c9fd3a8a6ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. A. Helmi
  2. M. Walker
  3. Timothy C. Beers
  4. J. Norris
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. A. Frebel
  7. R. Hirschi
  8. Hans-Walter Rix

Citations in the corpus