The Science of Multiple Intelligences Theory: A Response to Lynn Waterhouse

By H. Gardner, Seana Moran. 2006

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9294480345a00011f0a0a8bc4a6bc1453b11744

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. L. Waterhouse
2. Richard J. Haier
3. Kerri Anne Crowne

In Social Psychology

1. Richard J. Haier
2. L. Waterhouse
3. Kerri Anne Crowne
4. Robert L. Engle
5. R. Berk
6. H. Gardner
7. Seana Moran

Citations in the corpus

• The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence (2009, background): “Additionally, researchers have acknowledged that it is important to understand these concepts in a new light (Gardner, 1993, 1998; Gardner and Moran, 2006).”
• Inadequate Evidence for Multiple Intelligences, Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence Theories (2006, background): “Gardner and Moran (2006), Rauscher and Hinton (2006), and Cherniss et al. (2006) argued that MI, the music instruction effect, and EI were validated technical accounts of brain systems.”
• The Neuroscience of Intelligence (2016, methodology): “There are also models with less empirical evidence like those of Robert Sternberg (Gottfredson, 2003a; Sternberg, 2000, 2003) and Howard Gardner (Gardner, 1987; Gardner & Moran, 2006; Waterhouse, 2006) that de-emphasize or ignore the g-factor.”