Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions

By Meng Zhang, Jing Wang. 2009

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8f57a01027984a5cf9d1e1a409f182c5101026f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Yaacov Trope
2. Nira Liberman
3. Evan Polman
4. Yili Kevin Hong
5. Gordon Burtch
6. Ni Huang
7. Kentaro Fujita
8. Sam J. Maglio

In Social Psychology

1. Yaacov Trope
2. Nira Liberman
3. Evan Polman
4. Gordon Burtch
5. Ni Huang
6. Yili Kevin Hong
7. Kentaro Fujita
8. Sam J. Maglio

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Yaacov Trope
2. Evan Polman
3. Nira Liberman
4. Gordon Burtch
5. Yili Kevin Hong
6. Kentaro Fujita
7. Ayelet Fishbach
8. Adam M. Grant

Citations in the corpus

• The Common Currency of Psychological Distance (2013, background): “Whereas priming spatial distance leads people to assume that a target is equally distant on each of the other dimensions, spatial distance inferences did not budge in response to the priming of time, social distance, or likelihood (Zhang & Wang, 2009).”
• Content and process priming: A review ☆ (2014, unknown): “Zhang and Wang (2009) provided a much more complex example of process priming.”
• Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews (2016, background): “…which describes how a feeling of distance on one dimension serially influences how far another dimension of distance feels (Kim, Zauberman, & Bettman, 2012; Maglio & Polman, 2014; Maglio, Trope, & Liberman, 2013; Wakslak, 2012; Williams & Bargh, 2008; Yan, 2014; Zhang & Wang, 2009).”