Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equation modeling

By J. Billiet. 2003

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8f061da3d4a19197fc2ef924d20756b85935582

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between ethnic threat and economic insecurity in times of economic crisis: Analysis of European Social Survey data (2014, methodology): “Meuleman, Davidov and Billiet (2009), however, formulated a dynamic version of group conflict theory, arguing that changes in economic conditions might be more relevant than absolute levels of economic success with regard to our understanding of perceived ethnic threat.”
A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples (2012, methodology): “After all, measurement invariance of the values is required before cross-cultural comparisons may be carried out meaningfully (Billiet 2003; De Beuckelaer 2005; Steenkamp and Baumgartner 1998; Vandenberg 2002).”
Values and Support for Immigration : A Cross-Country Comparison (2008, background): “Consequently, the necessary attention will also be paid to the cross-cultural equivalence of the measurements (Hui and Triandis, 1985; Steenkamp and Baumgartner, 1998; Vandenberg and Lance, 2000; Harkness et al., 2003), an issue that is neglected too often.”
Measuring Tourists’ Emotional Experiences (2015, background): “Such line of research would require testing for measurement invariance before meaningful comparisons are made (Billiet 2003; Steenkamp and Baumgartner 2000; van de Vijver and Leung 2000).”
Using a Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explain Cross-Cultural Measurement Noninvariance (2012, background): “mean comparisons of the theoretical constructs of interest are problematic (Billiet, 2003).”
Testing for comparability of human values across countries and time with the third round of the European Social Survey (2010, background): “Absent invariance, comparisons of value mean levels or their correlates are problematic (Billiet, 2003; De Beuckelaer, 2005; Steenkamp and Baumgartenr, 1998; Vandenberg, 2002).”
Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey (2011, background): “Guaranteeing that the measurement of relevant constructs is invariant consequently constitutes a central concern when applying theories and instruments across different contexts of measurements like countries (Billiet 2003; Cheung and Rensvold 2002; Harkness, Van de Vijver and Mohler 2003).”
Individual and country-level factors affecting support for foreign aid (2008, background): “…are not interpreted in the same way across all countries, then we might see differences among countries in support for aid simply because questions are interpreted differently, and not because of actual differences (Adcock and Collier, 2001; Billiet, 2003; Steenkamp and Baumgartner, 1998).”
International handbook of survey methodology. (2008, background): “See Häder and Gabler (2003), Lynn, Häder, Gabler & Laaksonen (2007), Lepkowski (2005) on sampling in cross-national contexts; Saris (2003a, 2003b), Billiet (2003), van de Vijver (2003), and contributions in Hambleton, Merenda, & Spielberger (2005) cover important issues in instrument testing; on doc”
A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey (2008, methodology): “Rather, measurement invariance of theoretical constructs should also be assessed during data analysis (Billiet 2003).”