Beyond Copenhagen: REDD+, agriculture, adaptation strategies and poverty

By B. Campbell. 2009

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8d91cd51f68d3c7d421f6e8479cfaa88ebd34ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. K. Brown
2. J. Paavola
3. Shunsuke Managi
4. Constance L. McDermott
5. E. Corbera

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Corbera
2. K. Brown
3. J. Paavola
4. C. Mitchell
5. T. Sterner
6. M. Brockhaus
7. B. Cashore
8. M. Gregorio

In Soil Science

1. K. Brown
2. L. Goulder
3. E. Corbera

Citations in the corpus

• Offsetting Benefits? Analyzing Access to Forest Carbon (2010, background): “Current negotiations on how to halt deforestation through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the continuous expansion of the CDM, and the future US market will likely expand the commodification of carbon-sequestration services (Campbell, 2009; Neeff et al, 2009).”
• Win-win scenarios at the climate–development interface: Challenges and opportunities for stove replacement programs through carbon finance (2012, unknown): “…Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) is one of the emerging climate–development interfaces that holds distinct possibilities for win-win in local development and global climate mitigation, but is complex in its practical articulation (Campbell, 2009; Agrawal and Angelsen, 2009).”
• Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages (2017, background): “Similarly, carbon market revenues can contribute to adaptation through diversification of livelihoods and improved resilience to climatic shocks (Campbell, 2009).”
• National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “However, (Campbell, 2009) and (Adams and Hulme, 2001) argue that the 33 ability to define these win-win objectives is major factor for success.”
• Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. (2012, background): “However, in many countries, REDD+ strategies currently do not make a link with agriculture, while in some countries clear conflicts have been identified between REDD+ and agricultural policies [60 ,61,62].”