Practical Attack Graph Generation for Network Defense

By Kyle Ingols, Richard P. Lippmann, Keith Piwowarski. Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference, 2006

413 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8ac7572b0a5744e73d8762dbc865c8e15c3d76e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Ludovic Piètre-Cambacédès
2. Barbara Kordy
3. Patrick Schweitzer

In Information Systems

1. Ludovic Piètre-Cambacédès
2. Barbara Kordy
3. Patrick Schweitzer

In Signal Processing

1. Ludovic Piètre-Cambacédès
2. Barbara Kordy
3. Patrick Schweitzer

Citations in the corpus

• DAG-based attack and defense modeling: Don't miss the forest for the attack trees (2013, background): “[116] proposed multiple-prerequisite graphs, which also severely reduce the complexity of the graphs.”
• Optimal Network Security Hardening Using Attack Graph Games (2015, neutral): “They can be automatically generated based on known vulnerability databases [14, 24] and they are widely used in the network security to calculate security risk measures (e.”