Alone against the crowd: Individual differences in referees' ability to cope under pressure

By K. Page, Lionel Page. 2010

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8a31d92c6521b71d3ed0b265bdc213009591a7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Dominik Schreyer
2. J. Reade
3. Carl Singleton
4. Vincenzo Scoppa
5. Michela Ponzo
6. Jan Sauermann
7. Thomas J. Dohmen
8. Huw Lloyd-Ellis

In Gender Studies

1. Dominik Schreyer
2. J. Reade
3. Carl Singleton
4. Vincenzo Scoppa
5. Michela Ponzo
6. Jan Sauermann
7. Thomas J. Dohmen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Dominik Schreyer
2. Jan Sauermann
3. J. Reade
4. Thomas J. Dohmen
5. Carl Singleton
6. Daniel S. Hamermesh

Citations in the corpus

• Referee Bias (2016, methodology): “Similar favoritism is found by Page and Page (2010b) in Rugby competitions where referees in international leagues are often from the same countries as participating teams.”
• Eliminating Supportive Crowds Reduces Referee Bias (2021, background): “Looking at heterogeneity among referees, Page and Page (2010) showed that some referees are more susceptible to being influenced by a crowd than others.”
• Does the Home Advantage Depend on Crowd Support? Evidence From Same-Stadium Derbies (2018, background): “awarding more penalties and less disciplinary sanctions to the home team or conceding more injury time to it when is behind (Nevill et al. 2002; Garicano et al., 2005; Dohmen, 2008; Sutter and Kocher, 2004; Scoppa, 2008; Dawson and Dobson, 2010; Page and Page, 2010).”