Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty

By Anna Alberini, Kevin J. Boyle, Michael P. Welsh. 2003

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f89bc833ba487c7fd1f747053bf753975d1fc21b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments (2010, methodology): “Li and Mattsson 2005; Alberini et al. 2003; Chang et al. 2007), self-reported choice uncertainty is underinvestigated in repeated choice experiments (Lundhede et al. 2008). Using a 5-level Likert scale (very certain, certain, uncertain, very uncertain, don’t know), Lundhede et al. (2008) use selfrep”
Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling (2012, methodology): “The ordered probit model has been used in various studies to analyse multiple bounded uncertainty choice format data (Wang, 1997; Alberini et al., 2003; Balcombe et al., 2009b).”
Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2008, unknown): “2 A potentially important variant of this approach incorporates different degrees of certainty directly into the contingent valuation questions and adjusts the estimated willingness to pay (Johannesson et al., 1993; Ready et al., 1995, 2001; Alberini et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2003; Vossler and Poe”
Coherent Arbitrariness: On Value Uncertainty for Environmental Goods (2009, unknown): “An extension of this approach is given in Alberini et al. (2003) who build on the Welsh and Poe (1998) discrete choice approach, with multiple bids that allow respondents to express valuation uncertainty. A matrix was displayed to the respondent with suggested costs on the rows and categories of cer”
Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty (2009, background): “Loomis and Ekstrand 1998 and Alberini et al. 2003), it is found that taking into account symmetric uncertainty increases the WTP estimates. Our finding of low impact on WTP estimates indicates that the symmetric approach to recoding we have evaluated here mainly recodes choices between alternatives ”