Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity
By Leandro Da Silva Almeida, Lola Prieto, Mercedes Ferrándo, Emma Oliveira, Carmen Ferrándiz. 2008
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f87efeaebc530a915e46978dd6fafaadbc6c8291
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Gavriel Salvendy
- Robert W. Proctor
- Paul J Silvia
- Roger E. Beaty
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- James C. Kaufman
- Yoed N. Kenett
- Miriam Faust
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Gavriel Salvendy
- Robert W. Proctor
- Paul J Silvia
- Liang Zeng
- Roger E. Beaty
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- T. Kashdan
- Emily M. Grossnickle
Citations in the corpus
- Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? (2018, unknown): “These creative dimensions were first proposed by Guilford (1960) and later developed by Torrance (1966, 1990) in his creative figural and verbal tests, which have been validated in different parts of the world (Almeida et al., 2008; Kim, 2006; Primi et al., 2013; Wechsler 2004a, 2004b).”
- Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? (2011, background): “Subscales are so highly intercorrelated (0.74 to 0.80) that each of them does not provide meaningfully different information (Almeida et al., 2008; Clapham, 1998; Feldhusen & Goh, 1995; Kim, 2006; Mansfield et al., 1978).”
- Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. (2011, background): “In an analysis of several data sets, Almeida et al. (2008) found many differences according to task and method, which again indicates a lack of generality.”