Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers

By Daniel Belanche, Luis Vicente Casaló, Carlos Flavián. Industrial management & data systems, 2019

588 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Purpose Considering the increasing impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on financial technology (FinTech), the purpose of this paper is to propose a research framework to better understand robo-advisor adoption by a wide range of potential customers. It also predicts that personal and sociodemographic variables (familiarity with robots, age, gender and country) moderate the main relationships. Design/methodology/approach Data from a web survey of 765 North American, British and Portuguese potential users of robo-advisor services confirm the validity of the measurement scales and provide the input for structural equation modeling and multisample analyses of the hypotheses. Findings Consumers’ attitudes toward robo-advisors, together with mass media and interpersonal subjective norms, are found to be the key determinants of adoption. The influences of perceived usefulness and attitude are slightly higher for users with a higher level of familiarity with robots; in turn, subjective norms are significantly more relevant for users with a lower familiarity and for customers from Anglo-Saxon countries. Practical implications Banks and other firms in the finance industry should design robo-advisors to be used by a wide spectrum of consumers. Marketing tactics applied should consider the customer’s level of familiarity with robots. Originality/value This research identifies the key drivers of robo-advisor adoption and the moderating effect of personal and sociodemographic variables. It contributes to understanding consumers’ perceptions regarding the introduction of AI in FinTech.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8576d4e9f0b5caf0218e4866dfa095c01e954f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Paul Rodway
  2. Astrid Schepman
  3. Jeroen J. L. Schepers

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Luis Vicente Casaló
  2. Daniel Belanche
  3. Carlos Flavián
  4. S. K
  5. Devadas Menon
  6. Paul Rodway
  7. Astrid Schepman
  8. Jeroen J. L. Schepers

In Management Information Systems

  1. S. K
  2. Devadas Menon
  3. Daniel Belanche
  4. Luis Vicente Casaló
  5. Jeroen J. L. Schepers
  6. Carlos Flavián

Citations in the corpus