Different Partners, Different Selves: Strategic Verification of Circumscribed Identities

By W. Swann, J. Bosson, B. Pelham. 2002

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f84804cf1e0f6e182c9f60a8abe04c597547056c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bosson
2. Russell E. Johnson
3. J. G. Holmes
4. N. Collins
5. S. Murray
6. W. Swann

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. G. Holmes
2. S. Murray
3. J. Bosson
4. Russell E. Johnson
5. N. Collins
6. W. Swann
7. H. T. Reis
8. Shelly L. Gable

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bosson
2. Russell E. Johnson
3. N. Collins
4. W. Swann
5. M. Kernis
6. H. T. Reis
7. A. Greenwald
8. S. Schmukle

Citations in the corpus

• Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships. (2006, background): “…to believe that their partner sees qualities in them worth valuing—qualities that are not readily available in others.5 Consistent with this logic, people in dating relationships report wanting their partner to see them as more physically attractive than they see themselves (Swann et al., 2002).”
• Identity Negotiation at Work (2009, background): “If the survival of the relationship depends on targets' possession of a certain quality (e.g., ''physical attractiveness'' for people in a romantic relationship), people eschew their chronic identities in favor of situated identities that insure the survival of the relationship (Swann et al., 2002).”