Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space
By J. Murdoch. 2005
485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f811a8ca2faaf8c21b66fbce015bee4012bd5954
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations (2020, background): “…with relational thinking now spans a dizzying number of disciplines and fields, including human geography (Whatmore 2002; Castree 2003a, 2003b; Murdoch 2006; Jones 2009), sociology (Emirbayer 1997; DeLanda 2006; Dépelteau 2018), science and technology studies (Latour 1993, 2005; Law 2007),…”
- “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, background): “For example, the way people use land also determines which ecosystem services or bundles of ecosystem services can develop and how they relate to each other (on the relational understanding of space, see e.g. Davoudi and Strange, 2009; Jones, 2009; Massey, 2005; Murdoch, 2006).”
- Moral economies of food and geographies of responsibility (2009, background): “For an introduction to relational thinking in post-structuralist geography, see Murdoch (2005) and for the development of a relational ethics that encompasses both human and non-human actors, see Whatmore (1997).”
- Geographies of circulation and exchange: constructions of markets (2009, methodology): “While Actor-Network-Theory (ANT) as well as post-humanist approaches and poststructuralism more generally have been integrated into the work of human geographers for some time now (for overviews see Dixon and Jones III, 2004; Murdoch, 2006; Whatmore, 2004, 2006), Michel Callon’s seminal and original”