The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): a review of recent research.
By Duane F. Reinert, John P. Allen. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2002
1,146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7fd9aaa12cbb77a91fa22bc269ab32138fbda70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Neurology
In Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- The WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and Distribution of Mental Disorders (2018, positive): “…of the AUDIT we used, which defined alcohol use disorder as either a total score of 8 or a score of 4 on the AUDIT dependence questions (Babor, Higgins-Biddle, Saunders, & Monteiro, 2001), has been shown to have concordance with clinical diagnoses in the range AUC 0.78–0.91 (Reinert & Allen, 2002).”
- The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings. (2007, methodology): “SINCE OUR PREVIOUS review of the performancecharacteristics of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) (Reinert and Allen, 2002), a large number of important new studies have been published.”
- Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care To Reduce Risky/Harmful Alcohol Use by Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2004, methodology): “Many of the trials we reviewed used validated screening instruments (CAGE [4-item screening questionnaire to detect alcoholism], AUDIT [alcohol use disorders identification test—10-item instrument for risky/ harmful use]) that have been shown to have reasonable-togood test performance among primary ”
- Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems (2020, background): “Studies have suggested that the AUDIT has good reliability and validity for the purpose of clinical use (Babor et al., 2001; Reinert and Allen, 2002).”