The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings.

By Duane F. Reinert, John P. Allen. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2007

1,429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the AUDIT-C among college students (2015, methodology): “Typically, an individual cut-off score of 3 for females and 4 for males is used to identify hazardous alcohol use (Bradley et al., 2007; Dawson et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2013; Reinert & Allen, 2007; Young et al., 2006).”
Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16 (2015, background): “consistency and criterion-based validity across a range of clinical and community settings (Reinert and Allen 2007).”
Alcohol Expectancies, Pregaming, Drinking Games, and Hazardous Alcohol Use in a Multiethnic Sample of College Students (2010, methodology): “Although the AUDIT was originally developed as a screening device to identify individuals at risk for alcohol use disorders in primary health care settings, it has since been validated for use across several cultures, settings, and populations in assessing level of risk for a spectrum of problematic”
Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. (2016, background): “AUDIT scores (self-report versions) have shown high internal consistency and good diagnostic utility in samples of older veterans (Reinert & Allen, 2007) and OEF/OIF veterans (e.g., Crawford et al., 2013).”