Evaluation of quasi-linear diffusion coefficients for EMIC waves in a multispecies plasma

By J. Albert. 2003

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7e7b690fc1fabc7848ada1ca2856cc564ec151c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. R. Thorne
2. Nigel P. Meredith
3. R. Horne
4. Wen Li
5. Y. Shprits
6. Binbin Ni
7. Jacob Bortnik
8. S. Glauert

In Geophysics

1. R. Thorne
2. Nigel P. Meredith
3. R. Horne
4. Y. Shprits
5. Wen Li
6. Binbin Ni
7. Jacob Bortnik
8. Danny Summers

Citations in the corpus

• Acceleration mechanism responsible for the formation of the new radiation belt during the 2003 Halloween solar storm (2006, methodology): “The results of the code have been verified against a similar code [Albert, 2003, 2005].”
• Outward radial diffusion driven by losses at magnetopause (2006, background): “Such catastrophic decreases in fluxes during disturbed geomagnetic conditions could be explained either by increased EMIC wave activity and pitch angle scattering into a loss cone [Summers and Thorne, 2003; Albert, 2003], or could be due to the outward radial diffusion driven by losses to the magnet”
• Particle Dynamics in the Earth's Radiation Belts: Review of Current Research and Open Questions (2020, background): “Many recent studies are dedicated to the loss they cause to ultrarelativistic electrons (e.g., Thorne & Kennel, 1971; Albert, 2003; Jordanova et al., 2008; Miyoshi et al., 2008; Rodger et al., 2008, Rodger et al., 2015; Li et al., 2013, 2014; Usanova et al., 2014, 2016; Kersten et al., 2014; Blum…”
• Substorm dependence of plasmaspheric hiss (2004, background): “Recent theoretical and experimental work has shown that EMIC waves may indeed play an important role in the loss of relativistic electrons during enhanced geomagnetic activity [Lorentzen et al., 2000; Albert, 2003; Meredith et al., 2003b; Summers and Thorne, 2003].”
• Dynamic evolution of energetic outer zone electrons due to wave‐particle interactions during storms (2007, background): “quency. Our results confirm that resonant energies may become lower than 1 MeV, only if wave-particle interactions occur in the region of high density and wave frequencies closely approach the helium gyrofrequency, consistent with the previous studies of Summers and Thorne [2003] and Albert [2003] ”
• Resonant scattering of outer zone relativistic electrons by multiband EMIC waves and resultant electron loss time scales (2015, unknown): “Second, we have followed a number of previous studies [e.g., Summers and Thorne, 2003; Albert, 2003 JGR; Summers et al., 2007] to choose the three different but representative ion compositions for computing the scattering rates by the three EMIC wave band, which we think is reasonable for this…”
• Three‐dimensional electron radiation belt simulations using the BAS Radiation Belt Model with new diffusion models for chorus, plasmaspheric hiss, and lightning‐generated whistlers (2014, methodology): “Albert et al. [2009] presented a radiation belt model that included chorus wave-particle interactions, with a similar drift-averaged chorus model to Varotsou et al.”
• Earth's Van Allen Radiation Belts: From Discovery to the Van Allen Probes Era (2019, background): “, 2018), highly sensitive to background plasma density and ion composition (Albert, 2003; Li et al., 2007; Min et al., 2015; Summers & Thorne, 2003).”
• Precipitation of radiation belt electrons by EMIC waves, observed from ground and space (2008, methodology): “Awave spectrum with a wave power peak and band width obtained from observation (Figure 2), and a typical EMIC wave amplitude of 1 nT, were assumed [Summers and Thorne, 2003; Albert, 2003].”
• Observation of two distinct, rapid loss mechanisms during the 20 November 2003 radiation belt dropout event (2006, methodology): “: DROPOUT MECHANISMS OF 20 NOVEMBER 2003 7 of 11 A12216 medium to high pitch angles (a 30 –90 ) is comparable to that by EMIC at low pitch angles [Albert, 2003].”
• Relativistic electron precipitation by EMIC waves from self‐consistent global simulations (2008, methodology): “Theoretical estimates of the scattering rates indicate that electron loss is expected as well from electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whistler mode chorus [e.g., Thorne and Kennel, 1971; Albert, 2003; Summers and Thorne, 2003].”
• The dual role of ELF/VLF chorus waves in the acceleration and precipitation of radiation belt electrons (2007, background): “…process during the main phase of storms, comparable to other loss processes which also act on the timescale of a day, such as combined scattering by plasmaspheric hiss and EMIC waves (Albert, 2003; Summers and Thorne, 2003) as well as radial diffusion due to ULF waves (Shprits and Thorne, 2004).”
• Global simulation of EMIC wave excitation during the 21 April 2001 storm from coupled RCM‐RAM‐HOTRAY modeling (2010, background): “…with relativistic electrons, causing rapid scattering loss [Thorne and Kennel, 1971, Lyons and Thorne, 1973, Jordanova et al., 2008], but the minimum energy for electron resonance is strongly dependent on ion composition and plasma density [Summers and Thorne, 2003, Albert, 2003, Li et al., 2007].”
• On the storm‐time evolution of relativistic electron phase space density in Earth's outer radiation belt (2013, background): “…chorus [e.g., Horne and Thorne, 2003; O’Brien et al., 2004; Bortnik and Thorne, 2007], whistler waves originating from lightning and ground-based VLF transmitters [e.g., Abel and Thorne, 1998a; 1998b], and electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves [e.g., Summers and Thorne, 2003; Albert, 2003].”
• Testing loss mechanisms capable of rapidly depleting relativistic electron flux in the Earth's outer radiation belt (2004, background): “Also, what mechanism caused the electrons to be scattered and precipitated into the atmosphere? Several mechanisms have been suggested which could explain the observed precipitation, including scattering due to increased field line curvature and interaction with waves such as electron cyclotron harm”
• Modeling radiation belt electron dynamics during GEM challenge intervals with the DREAM3D diffusion model (2013, background): “…the plasmasphere [Lyons et al., 1972; Lyons and Thorne, 1973; Abel and Thorne, 1998; Meredith et al., 2007], and electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves preferentially generated near the plasmapause [Fraser and Nguyen, 2001; Albert, 2003; Summers and Thorne, 2003; Loto’aniu et al., 2006].”
• Circulation of Heavy Ions and Their Dynamical Effects in the Magnetosphere: Recent Observations and Models (2014, background): “The EMIC waves excited during active conditions can resonantly interact with electrons and protons causing their strong precipitation to the atmosphere due to pitch angle scattering (Thorne and Kennel 1971; Summers and Thorne 2003; Albert 2003).”
• Dynamics of the Earth’s Particle Radiation Environment (2009, background): “…ring current, EMIC waves, at frequencies between the proton and the helium gyrofrequency and between the helium and the oxygen gyrofrequency, are, theoretically, very effective in scattering radiation belt electrons into the loss cone (Summers and Thorne 2003; Albert 2003; Glauert and Horne 2005).”