Scaling of small repeating earthquakes explained by interaction of seismic and aseismic slip in a rate and state fault model

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards inferring earthquake patterns from geodetic observations of interseismic coupling (2010, background): “In this framework, earthquakes and aseismic slip are mainly linked to VW and VS segments, respectively, although earthquakes can penetrate into VS segments and parts of VW segments can experience aseismic sli”
Three‐dimensional boundary integral modeling of spontaneous earthquake sequences and aseismic slip (2009, methodology): “communication, 2008). Chen and Lapusta [2009] have found that the resulting estimate,”
Earthquake Initiation From Laboratory Observations and Implications for Foreshocks (2019, unknown): “D fault (Chen & Lapusta, 2009; Kaneko & Ampuero, 2011; Schaal & Lapusta, 2019).”
A domain decomposition approach to implementing fault slip in finite‐element models of quasi‐static and dynamic crustal deformation (2013, background): “Chen and Lapusta [2009] examined the behavior of small repeating earthquakes by modeling a stable sliding region (friction increases with slip rate) surrounding an unstable sliding region (friction decreases with slip rate).”