Response to within family selection for body weight in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using a single-trait animal model

By R. Bolivar, G. Newkirk. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: Composition and genetic parameters of a synthetic base population of Oreochromis niloticus for selective breeding (2007, background): “56 in Nile tilapia selected for growth rate over 12 generations (Bolivar and Newkirk, 2002) is likely due to the fact that the c effect was not accounted for in the animal model fitted.”
Severity of soybean meal induced distal intestinal inflammation, enterocyte proliferation rate, and fatty acid binding protein (Fabp2) level differ between strains of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (2012, result): “, 2003), and Nile tilapia (Bolivar and Newkirk, 2002; Charo-Karisa et al., 2006; Rezk et al., 2009).”
Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: Genetic parameters for body weight at harvest in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) during five generations of testing in multiple environments (2012, background): “Information is also available on predicted and realized (Bolivar and Newkirk, 2002; Ponzoni et al., 2005; Rezk et al., 2009; Thodesen et al., 2011) or on predicted (Charo-Karisa et al.”