History, institutions and economic performance : the legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India

By Abhijit Banerjee, Lakshmi Shankar Iyer. 2005

1,379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We analyze the colonial land revenue institutions set up by the British in India, and show that differences in historical property rights institutions lead to sustained differences in economic outcomes. Areas in which proprietary rights in land were historically given to landlords have significantly lower agricultural investments and productivity in the post-independence period than areas in which these rights were given to the cultivators. These areas also have significantly lower investments in health and education. These differences are not driven by omitted variables or endogeneity problems; they probably arise because differences in historical institutions lead to very different policy choices.

Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7c8b39263efe60a1fa98e372a59e3d0b882a6d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

  1. F. Caicedo
  2. Debraj Ray
  3. É. Huillery
  4. B. K. Jack
  5. James Fenske
  6. Christopher B. Barrett
  7. Abhijit Banerjee
  8. Joan Esteban

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Abhijit Banerjee
  2. Thierry Mayer
  3. A. Shleifer
  4. Keith Head
  5. Luc Laeven
  6. F. Caicedo
  7. Maitreesh Ghatak
  8. R. La Porta

In Soil Science

  1. B. K. Jack
  2. É. Huillery
  3. Sanchari Roy
  4. Abhijit Banerjee
  5. Teevrat Garg
  6. Maitreesh Ghatak
  7. L. McBride
  8. Gabriel Katz

Citations in the corpus