Explaining Causal Findings Without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects
By Avidit Acharya, M. Blackwell, M. Sen. American Political Science Review, 2016
461 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c117cef9c44e85fc619ad27db8fd37a7de58149
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Sociology and Political Science
- Felix Elwert
- Randolph Stevenson
- Brendan Nyhan
- John V. Kane
- Michelle Torres
- Jason Barabas
- Luke Keele
- J. Montgomery
In Statistics and Probability
- Brendan Nyhan
- Felix Elwert
- Randolph Stevenson
- J. Montgomery
- Michelle Torres
- Jason Barabas
- Luke Keele
- Judea Pearl
Citations in the corpus
- Does Institutional Quality Foster Economic Complexity? (2019, unknown): “However, this widely adopted method yields inconsistent estimates due to intermediate variables bias (Acharya et al., 2016).”
- Impact of Violent Crime on Risk Aversion: Evidence from the Mexican Drug War (2019, unknown): “We adopt the mediation procedure outlined in Acharya, Blackwell, and Sen (2016) and compare estimates of the average controlled direct effect (ACDE) with our main result to provide a sense of how much of the effect of violence on risk aversion can be explained by different sets of mediators.”
- The Long-Run Impacts of Same-Race Teachers (2017, unknown): “” (24)The mediation analysis is prone to bias caused by what Acharya et al. (2016) call intermediate confounders and what Imai et al. (2010) call the failure of sequential ignorability: the mediators (absences and achievement) are themselves potentially affected by other unobserved mediators.”
- No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments (2018, background): “…we acknowledge that some researchers use FMCs to conduct analyses on “passers” only, this practice raises concerns regarding posttreatment bias (e.g., Acharya, Blackwell, and Sen 2016; Montgomery, Nyhan, and Torres 2018) and/or unrepresentative samples (Berinsky, Margolis, and Sances 2014,…”
- The causal interpretation of estimated associations in regression models (2019, background): “(2011), Acharya et al. (2016), and Van der Weele (2015) for more details on indirect and direct effects.”
- How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It (2018, background): “…recognized in the fields of statistics, econometrics, and political methodology (e.g., Rosenbaum 1984; Wooldridge 2005; King and Zeng 2006; Elwert and Winship 2014; Acharya, Blackwell, and Sen 2016), there is still significant confusion in the wider discipline about its sources and consequences.”