‘Touch’ in educational and child care settings: dilemmas and responses

By H. Piper, Hannah Smith. 2003

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7a646283801fe9bcbf2f46d7ffc143302aacd2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jools Page
2. Martha L. Abell
3. J. Braselton

In General Health Professions

1. Jools Page

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jools Page

Citations in the corpus

• Do mothers want professional carers to love their babies? (2011, background): “Piper and Smith (2003) discuss the ‘moral panic’ around child protection faced by professionals who work with children in relation to holding, touching, and kissing.”
• CHAPTER 9 (2019, background): “There remains real concern for some professionals about child protection reprisals in relation to holding, touching and kissing (Piper and Smith, 2003).”
• The Coordination of Talk and Touch in Adults’ Directives to Children: Touch and Social Control (2015, unknown): “In contrast to the U.S. and Great Britain, teachers’ touch in educational settings has not been an issue for public debates and restrictions (Piper & Smith, 2003). precise or general way, referred to or was indexical of the required action, usually focalizing the initiation of embodied response…”