Radio‐telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A framework for assessing threats and benefits to species responding to climate change (2011, methodology): “…field guides, supplemented by relevant journal publications (Willby & Eaton 1993; Dyer, Lindsay & Lusby 2001; Neilsen, Riis & Brix 2005; Rink & Sinsch 2007), Plantlife species dossiers for Broad-leaved cudweed (Plantlite 2006a) and Red hemp-nettle (Plantlife 2006b) and Bat Conservation…”
A Red List of Italian Saproxylic Beetles: taxonomic overview, ecological features and conservation issues (Coleoptera) (2015, background): “For example, populations of Lucanus cervus that are isolated by more than 3 km have a high probability of suffering local extinctions (Rink & Sinsch 2007), because this distance is greater than the radius of dispersion observed on average for this species.”
Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry (2008, methodology): “This method has only recently been used in studies of flying woodliving insects (Hedin and Ranius 2002; Rink and Sinsch 2007).”
Bionomics and distribution of the stag beetle, Lucanus cervus (L.) across Europe * (2011, methodology): “It is known that dispersal distances of both sexes are limited, and may be as low as a few hundred metres (Rink & Sinsch, 2006).”