Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation

By Wenzhe Ma, A. Trusina, H. El-Samad, Wendell A. Lim, Chao Tang. Cell, 2009

970 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many signaling systems show adaptation — the ability to reset themselves after responding to a stimulus. We computationally searched all possible three‐node enzyme network topologies to identify those that could perform adaptation. Only two major core topologies emerge as robust solutions: a negative feedback loop with a buffering node and an incoherent feedforward loop with a proportioner node. Minimal circuits containing these topologies are, within proper regions of parameter space, sufficient to achieve adaptation. More complex circuits that robustly perform adaptation all contain at least one of these topologies at their core. This analysis yields a design table highlighting a finite set of adaptive circuits. Despite the diversity of possible biochemical networks, it may be common to find that only a finite set of core topologies can execute a particular function. These design rules provide a framework for functionally classifying complex natural networks and a manual for engineering networks.

Subfields: Biophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7667b99e8a1d7cfab2a4c3feffe03f15a34d2ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biophysics

  1. Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
  2. Joseph A. Marsh
  3. Jeremy E. Purvis
  4. Sarah A. Teichmann
  5. Y. Yarden
  6. Galit Lahav
  7. R. Avraham

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ben M. Webb
  2. Andrej Sali
  3. Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
  4. Joseph A. Marsh
  5. Sarah A. Teichmann
  6. Keren Lasker
  7. Jeremy E. Purvis
  8. Carol V. Robinson

Citations in the corpus