SCALING UP ANIMAL MOVEMENTS IN HETEROGENEOUS LANDSCAPES: THE IMPORTANCE OF BEHAVIOR
By J. Morales, Stephen P. Ellner. 2002
285 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f75f337f136aa62d83f87866ad8101a4bc246aef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Boyce
- G. Pyke
- H. Muller‐Landau
- Jason Matthiopoulos
- Stephen P. Hubbell
- Evelyn H. Merrill
- Richard S. Condit
- Jacqui Frair
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- H. Muller‐Landau
- Stephen P. Hubbell
- M. Boyce
- Richard S. Condit
- Stephen J. Wright
- H. Van Dyck
- Evelyn H. Merrill
- Jason Matthiopoulos
Citations in the corpus
- WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK (2005, methodology): “We drew random steps from observed distributions of lengths and turning angles, as for correlated random walk models (e.g., Turchin 1998, Morales and Ellner 2002, Fortin 2003).”
- Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. (2008, methodology): “Morales & Ellner (2002) examined whether a random walk framework can be used to translate small-scale, within-patch movement data to larger scale spread in heterogeneous landscapes.”
- Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape (2005, background): “Other researchers have documented both strong (Wennergren et al. 1995, Goodwin and Fahrig 2002a) and weak (Gustafson and Gardner 1996, Morales and Ellner 2002 ) behavioral effects of differences in patch arrangement in simulated landscapes.”
- Behavioral intermittence, Lévy patterns, and randomness in animal movement (2009, methodology): “This ‘multiple’ random walk (MRW) approach is based on the consideration of animal movement as a set of ‘behavioral modes’ that change over time (Johnson et al. 2002, Morales and Ellner 2002, Morales et al. 2004, Ovaskainen 2004, Ovaskainen et al. 2008).”
- Understanding movements of organisms: it's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis (2015, background): “Such a process has been referred to as ‘scaling up’ by a number of authors (Morales & Ellner 2002; Schick et al. 2008; Reynolds 2012d).”
- Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes (2005, background): “However, movement behavior in heterogeneous landscapes is still poorly understood (Lima and Zollner 1996; Zollner and Lima 1999; Morales and Ellner 2002).”
- Movement heterogeneity of dugongs, Dugong dugon (Müller), over large spatial scales (2006, methodology): “The CRW model may be too simplistic to describe accurately the movement behaviour of a species that uses complex movement rules across different scales (Morales and Ellner, 2002; Doerr and Doerr, 2004; Nams, 2005).”
- Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success (2014, background): “A path that might look like having no recurring patterns at a small geographical scale might reveal such patterns once we look at the movement path at a larger scale (Morales and Ellner, 2002).”
- Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? (2005, background): “Using Tribolium beetles, Morales and Ellner (2002) have experimentally illustrated the difficulties of extrapolating observed movements to larger spatial (and temporal) scales.”
- Interspecific variation in primary seed dispersal in a tropical forest (2008, background): “…for sleeping or travelling, the tendency in some species for multiple individual seeds to move together, and discrete defecation and regurgitation events can be captured in our model only by the negative binomial dispersion parameter (Morales & Ellner 2002; Westcott et al. 2005; Russo et al. 2006).”
- Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. (2006, background): “Furthermore, important biological information on animal space use patterns resides in the spatial and temporal autocorrelation patterns (Cushman et al. 2005), as well as in individual behavioural differences ( Morales & Ellner 2002 ).”
- Difference in spatiotemporal patterns of wildlife road-crossings and wildlife-vehicle collisions (2012, background): “Movement reflects a decision-making process including individual differences and behavioral change over time (Morales and Ellner, 2002; Hawkes, 2009).”