Habitat loss, fragmentation and predator impact: spatial implications for prey conservation

By M. Schneider. 2001

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f747ea5adf119288ba92bd25ae8671bbe189b582

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Effects of landscape composition, habitat features, and nest distribution on predation rates of simulated turtle nests (2004, background): “However, Schneider (2001) noted that long-term predator management may be problematic and is not a viable solution in landscapes where predator densities are high and subsidized by human activity.”
Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, background): “Human-dominated areas are more fragmented than most natural habitats and have an altered prey base compared to natural habitats (Sauvajot et al. 1998, Schneider 2001).”
Variation in top‐down control of avian reproductive success across a fragmentation gradient (2003, background): “Studies on the effects of edges and fragmentation on abundance of small mammals have shown either a strong effect (Bolger et al. 1997a, Schneider 2001) or little to no effect (Heske 1995, Laakkonen et al. 2001).”
Environmental and vegetation variables have a greater influence than habitat fragmentation in structuring lizard communities in remnant urban bushland (2004, unknown): “1996), altering predator–prey dynamics (i.e. subsidized predators) (Schneider 2001) and increasing human access to natural areas (Dickman 1987).”
Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances (2015, background): “For example, stray and pet cats that are fed by humans hunt in nature reserves out of instinct, not hunger, so there is no limit on the number of cats that a reserve can ‘support’, potentially resulting in hyperpredation of prey species (Schneider, 2001).”
Nest Predation of Greater Sage-Grouse in Relation to Microhabitat Factors and Predators (2010, background): “…high numbers in humanaltered habitats are of great conservation concern because they can substantially reduce prey populations (Garrott et al. 1993, Schneider 2001) and these predators have been shown to continue depredating bird nests even at low prey densities (Polis et al. 1997, Sinclair et al.…”
Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. (2006, background): “Additional theoretical work further underscores, the important role that spilloverpredation or predator cross-edge incursions may play in determining the persistence of within patch prey populations (Oksanen et al. 1992; Cantrell et al. 2001; Schneider 2001; Cantrell et al. 2002).”
Deconstructing myths on large gulls and their impact on threatened sympatric waterbirds (2007, background): “For these reasons, there has recently been increasing concern about the suitability of controlling predators to enhance the survival of threatened species (Côté & Sutherland, 1995, 1997; Schneider, 2001).”
Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions (2012, background): “Certain predator species may in fact be capable of affecting populations of different prey species not only in their usual habitat but also in neighbouring areas through spill-over predation (Schneider 2001).”