The Labor Market in the Great Recession: An Update
By Michael W L Elsby, B. Hobijn, Aysegul Sahin, Robert G. Valletta. 2011
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f746a2403ce367ef614237f8702c08a9315ddc10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alan B. Krueger
- Fabian Lange
- Kory Kroft
- Judd N. L. Cramer
- Matthew J. Notowidigdo
- Ayşegül Şahin
- Lawrence F. Katz
- Laurence Ball
Citations in the corpus
- Do Extended Unemployment Benefits Lengthen Unemployment Spells? Evidence from Recent Cycles in the U.S. Labor Market (2013, unknown): “As noted by Elsby et al. (2011), it is likely that individuals’ reported unemployment duration reflects the time elapsed since the loss of a salient job, which is likely the one that enabled”
- On the importance of the participation margin for labor market fluctuations (2013, background): “As noted by Elsby et al. (2011) and Farber and Valletta (2013), however, such respondents often report durations well in excess of one month.”
- Are the Long-Term Unemployed on the Margins of the Labor Market? (2014, background): “35 Labor force exits and their effect on the unemployment rate have been neglected in much past research, although recent work by Elsby et al. (2013) suggests that changes in the participation margin account for 33 percent of the cyclical variation in the unemployment rate.”
- CAPITAL DESTRUCTION, JOBLESS RECOVERIES, AND THE DISCIPLINE DEVICE ROLE OF UNEMPLOYMENT (2012, unknown): “This view has been recently corroborated during the last recession [Elsby et al. (2011)].”
- Long-Term Unemployment and the Great Recession: The Role of Composition, Duration Dependence, and Nonparticipation (2016, methodology): “Elsby et al. ð2011Þ show that roughly 60% of the inflows into unemployment at reported durations longer than 1 month originate from nonparticipation.”
- Okun's Law: Fit at Fifty? (2013, background): “Subsequently, this anomaly disappeared because output data for 2009 were revised downward (Elsby et al., 2011). and cannot reject equality of all coefficients (p-value = 0.38).4”