Angler Responses to Potential Harvest Regulations in a Norwegian Sport Fishery: A Conjoint-Based Choice Modeling Approach

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model (2010, background): “…contribute to an individual angler's utility function , and the relative importance of fishery attributes (such as fish size or crowding), called part-worth-utilities, for total angler utility varies substantially among different angler types (Aas et al. 2000; Oh et al. 2005a; Oh and Ditton 2006).”
Using Recreation Specialization to Understand Multi-Attribute Management PReferences (2006, background): “The second-generation preference studies completed to date have analyzed aggregate samples and drawn conclusions on an average angler basis (e.g., Aas et al., 2000; Gillis & Ditton, 2002; Oh et al., 2005b).”
Documented and Potential Biological Impacts of Recreational Fishing: Insights for Management and Conservation (2006, background): “Angling is size-selective and targets larger, and often, but not always, older fish (Aas et al., 2000; Radomski, 2003).”