Mixed Methods Research

By C. Ridenour, Isadore Newman. 2008

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6f42501842c32279a429a5b41ea2f10a62d1a9e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. V. Venkatesh
2. Susan A. Brown
3. Hillol Bala
4. Michael I. Barrett
5. Markos Zachariadis
6. Susan V. Scott
7. James Y. L. Thong
8. Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi

Citations in the corpus

• Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems (2013, methodology): “This classification is consistent with Guba and Lincoln (2005) and Ridenour and Newman (2008) who discussed two types of validation issues in qualitative research: rigor in the application of methods (design validity) and rigor in the interpretation of data (analytical and inferential validities).”
• Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research (2013, background): “…historical narratives, etc.) are “epistemologically valid” (Tsoukas 1989, p. 556) and more capable of describing a phenomenon, constructing propositions (or hypothesizing), and identifying structures and interactions between complex mechanisms (Layder 1990; Sayer 2000; Volkoff et al. 2007).”