Filaments, Bubbles, and Weak Shocks in the Gaseous Atmosphere of M87

By W. Forman, C. Jones, E. Churazov, M. Markevitch, P. Nulsen, A. Vikhlinin, M. Begelman, H. Böhringer, J. Eilek, S. Heinz and 3 more. 2006

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first results from a 500 ks Chandra ACIS-I observation of M87. At soft energies (0.5-1.0 keV), we detect filamentary structures associated with the eastern and southwestern X-ray and radio arms. Many filaments are spatially resolved with widths of ~300 pc. This filamentary structure is particularly striking in the eastern arm, where we suggest the filaments are outer edges of a series of plasma-filled, buoyant bubbles whose ages differ by ~6 × 106 yr. These X-ray structures may be influenced by magnetic filamentation. At hard energies (3.5-7.5 keV), we detect a nearly circular ring of outer radius 2.8' (13 kpc), which provides an unambiguous signature of a weak shock, driven by an outburst from the supermassive black hole (SMBH). The density rise in the shock is ρshock/ρ0 ≈ 1.3 (Mach number, M ≈ 1.2). The observed spectral hardening in the ring corresponds to a temperature rise Tshock/T0 ≈ 1.2, or M ≈ 1.2, in agreement with the Mach number derived independently from the gas density. Thus, for the first time, we detect gas temperature and density jumps associated with a classical shock in the atmosphere around a SMBH. We also detect two additional surface brightness edges and pressure enhancements at radii of ~0.6' and ~1'. The ~0.6' feature may be overpressurized thermal gas surrounding the relativistic plasma in the radio cocoon, the "piston," produced by the current episode of AGN activity. The overpressurized gas is surrounded by a cool gas shell. The ~1' feature may be an additional weak shock from a secondary outburst. In an earlier episode, the piston was responsible for driving the 2.8' shock.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6e9141f48a3509012b3671aa88a5bfb01e8938a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. A. C. Fabian
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Y. Dubois
  7. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  8. B. McNamara

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. A. C. Fabian
  3. B. McNamara
  4. P. Nulsen
  5. H. Böhringer
  6. N. Werner
  7. R. Hickox
  8. Jeremy S. Sanders

Citations in the corpus