Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use

By J. Levine. 2005

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2444776806c40ac6afab59f017b0a41554e23827

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Station area projects in Europe and beyond: towards transit oriented development? (2012, background): “A large institutional barrier is, for instance, restrictive zoning policies that prevent mixed use and dense developments, despite a market that would support such development (Levine, 2005).”
Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development (2011, background): “Given that developments containing pedestrian- and transit-oriented features are in relatively short supply (Leinberger 2008; Levine 2005; Levine, Inam, and Torng 2005), the demand for those features should be reflected by a price premium that buyers or renters are willing to pay for those…”
Sustainable Transport in Freiburg: Lessons from Germany's Environmental Capital (2011, background): “Land-owners cannot seek compensation if development rights are not granted (Hirt 2007 ; Levine 2006 ; Wiegandt 2004 ).”
Walking, Urban Design, and Health (2008, background): “…has become controversial, with some authors arguing that even if persons select into neighborhoods to support their desired travel behavior, if such neighborhoods are in short supply, building pedestrian-oriented communities will increase the amount of walking (e.g., Levine 2005; Talen 2007).”
Zoning For and Against Sprawl: The Case for Form-Based Codes (2013, background): “For decades now, there have been thorough explorations of the inefficiencies, social inequities, and added costs of conventional zoning codes (Dowall 1984; Levine 2005).”
Compactness versus Sprawl (2015, methodology): “In a follow-up study, Sarzynski et al. (2014b) ran a cluster analysis, based on fourteen dimensions measured for 2000, and proposed a new typology for metropolitan areas which categorizes metropolitan areas in four types: ascendants, insulars, redevelopers, and cosmopolitans. Early on, Ewing, Pendal”
Demand for Public Transport in Germany and the USA: An Analysis of Rider Characteristics (2012, background): “With the exception of some recent transit-oriented developments (TODs), land-use planning in the USA is generally fragmented, inconsistent, and conflicting across local jurisdictions and rarely integrated with transport plans (Burchell, Lowenstein, Dolphin, & Galley, 2002 ; Levine, 2006 ).”