Spatial interactions among U.S. cities: 1900–1990
By Linda Harris Dobkins, Yannis M. Ioannides. 2001
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f649a18ee6125af44b92b8e7d8ff7897299d7e01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Mark D. Partridge
- Martijn J. Burger
- E. Meijers
- D. Rickman
- Kamar Ali
- M. R. Olfert
- J. Henderson
- Kristian Giesen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Mark D. Partridge
- Martijn J. Burger
- E. Meijers
- Kamar Ali
- D. Rickman
- Rafael González‐Val
- M. R. Olfert
- Jose Olmo
Citations in the corpus
- Growth in a Cross-section of Cities: Location, Increasing Returns or Random Growth? (2015, methodology): “US urban growth has also been analysed using other geographical units: counties (Beeson et al., 2001), minor civil divisions (Michaels et al., 2012), metropolitan areas (Dobkins & Ioannides, 2001; Black & Henderson, 2003; Ioannides & Overman, 2003) and urbanised areas (Garmestani et al., 2008).”
- City Age and City Size (2014, background): “Among the few existing papers are Dobkins and Ioannides (2001), Henderson and (2007), Gonzáles-Val et al. (2012) and Desmet and Rappaport (2012).”
- Departures from Gibrat's Law, Discontinuities and City Size Distributions (2007, background): “Historical advantage also serves to reinforce natural advantage and, in areas that were developed first, cities have the capacity to attract growth at a faster rate than later additions to the urban landscape (Arthur, 1988; Dobkins and Ioannides, 2001).”
- The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities (2010, unknown): “…with Zipf’s law generally rely on the existence of random growth (Champernowne 1953; Simon 1955; Krugman 1996; Levy and Solomon 1996; Gabaix 1999a; Dobkins and Ioannides 2001; Davis and Weinstein 2002; Gabaix and Ioannides 1See Bryan, Minton and Sarte (2007) for an alternative analysis of…”
- Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’ (2017, background): “The authors do, however, find that growth in nearby cities leads to local urban growth, thereby diminishing the importance of local growth factors (Dobkins and Ioannides, 2001).”
- Scale Economies and the Geographic Concentration of Industry (2000, background): “In related work, Dobkins and Ioannides (1999) examine the relationship between city population growth and neighboring regions in more detail.”
- Urbanization and Growth (2005, background): “More comprehensive formulations in Duranton (2004) and Rossi-Hansberg and Wright (2004) are discussed in the theory section.”
- The Evolution of City Size Distributions (2004, background): “Dobkins and Ioannides (2001) confirm broad features of Simon’s model, that is, that the probability of new cities appearing in the immediate vicinity of old cities and thus leading to large urban agglomerations, is increasing in the size of the existing city.”
- Do New Economic Geography agglomeration shadows underlie current population dynamics across the urban hierarchy (2009, background): “Firms in the areas closest to agglomeration centers find themselves in a ‘growth shadow’ (Dobkins and Ioannides 2001), in which they are competitive in producing only the most basic goods and services.”