Do New Economic Geography agglomeration shadows underlie current population dynamics across the urban hierarchy

By Mark D. Partridge, D. Rickman, Kamar Ali, M. R. Olfert. 2009

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98646eca1a824086756bf3e6e333ea91f0e25908

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Martijn J. Burger
2. E. Meijers
3. Anjali Adukia
4. Mark D. Partridge
5. L. Christiaensen
6. Antti Vasanen
7. Xingjian Liu
8. Yingcheng Li

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Martijn J. Burger
2. E. Meijers
3. Anjali Adukia
4. Mark D. Partridge
5. L. Christiaensen
6. Muhammad Shahbaz
7. Mark W. Frank

Citations in the corpus

• Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’ (2017, methodology): “Alonso mentions per capita income and faster (population) growth – indicators also used by Partridge et al. (2008, 2009, 2010), who also add housing cost development.”
• Economic and Social Development along the Urban-Rural Continuum: New Opportunities to Inform Policy (2021, background): “For instance, Partridge et al. (2009) and Chen & Partridge (2013) find that spread effects are the dominant urban–rural spillover in the United States of America and China, respectively; however, they also find that being in the ‘‘shadow” of large cities reduces the economic growth of nearby…”