Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations

By Mark A. Lemley. 2002

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f63530870e48db0f55043d67a0ffdf0988c75211

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Standard-Essential Patents (2015, background): “, Lemley 2002 and Skitol 2005 among many others), proposals to relieve the flow of litigation on these ideas (e.g., Lemley and Shapiro (2013)’s suggestion to require owners of standard-essential patents to enter into binding “final offer” arbitration with any potential licensee to determine the roya”
The Dynamics of Open Strategy: From Adoption to Reversion (2017, unknown): “They also constitute a breed of innovation where (advanced) users are themselves the innovators (Franke and Shah, 2003; Lakhani and von Hippel, 2003; Lerner and Tirole, 2002; O ’ Mahony and Bechky, 2008; Raymond, 2001).”
Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications (2008, background): “…setting covers dozens of electronics industries.1 In response, a stream of empirical research on committee-based standardization is emerging (Lemley 2002, Dokko 1 3GPP does not appear in the data sets of Chiao et al. (2006) or Lemley (2002), but their data do include ETSI, the European…”
The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis (2007, background): “Another doctrine, termed by Lemley (2002) "implied license," covers situations when a firm discloses its patent holdings but then fails to comply with the restrictions on licensing to which it concurred.”
An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential Patent Claims in Compatibility Standards (2011, background): “…patents, and sometimes even patents for entirely different products, agreements on future patents, etc. Firm strategies for patents in standards receive increasing interest in the academic community, including contributions from Lemley (2002), Ciao et al. (2007), and Simcoe et al. (2009).”
Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, and Platform Technologies (2009, unknown): “…completed standards, most SSOs offer their members a quid pro quo: in return for the opportunity to promote their proprietary technology, firms must disclose relevant IP, and if it becomes part of the standard, offer a nonexclusive license at “reasonable” rates (Lemley, 2002; Chiao et al., 2007).”
Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations (2008, background): “Lemley (2002) presents a survey of the various policies that SSOs have adopted.”