Port privatization policy and practice

By Kevin P. B. Cullinane, Dong-Wook Song. 2002

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f60a01d0bfec7b2bd50068e9fda2b378e36508d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. MarI´a Manuela González
2. A. Frémont
3. Lourdes Trujillo
4. B. Slack

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Hoffmann
2. G. Wilmsmeier
3. MarI´a Manuela González
4. Lourdes Trujillo
5. A. Frémont
6. B. Slack
7. Mark Goh
8. Y. Wu

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. J. Hoffmann
2. G. Wilmsmeier
3. Lourdes Trujillo
4. MarI´a Manuela González
5. A. Frémont
6. B. Slack
7. Theo E. Notteboom *
8. Olaf M. Merk

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Port Characteristics on International Maritime Transport Costs (2006, background): “…transport costs are not at all straightforward (see for example Tovar et al (2003) for a literature overview of cost functions in the port sector; Cullinane and Song (2002) on private sector participation in ports; Hoffmann (2001) on ports in Latin America; Langen (2004) on maritime clusters and…”
• Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global (2005, background): “Privatization of the ports sector has been a policy response in many countries to improve efficiency and reduce the burden on public finances (Cullinane and Song, 2002).”
• Efficiency Measurement in the Port Industry: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2009, result): “On the contrary, Cullinane et al. (2005a) find no evidence for upholding a relationship between privatization and efficiency, which is consistent with the findings of Cullinane and Song (2002).”