TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks
By Arati Manjeshwar, Dharma P. Agrawal. Proceedings, International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), 2001
2,732 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5f726d19b5c19980b59e0b2aa82938748bdd037
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Xuxun Liu
- Stefanos A. Nikolidakis
- Dimitrios D. Vergados
- Nikolaos A. Pantazis
- M. M. Afsar
- Mohammad-H. Tayarani-N.
- Lars Michael Kristensen
- Knut Øvsthus
Citations in the corpus
- Overview of Data Routing Approaches for Wireless Sensor Networks (2012, background): “The protocols in [14] and [64] are suitable for time-critical applications.”
- A survey on routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (2012, methodology): “The main aim of SPIN protocol is to forename the data using advanced descriptors or meta-data.”
- Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Multihop Performance (2003, background): “Routing is coupled with a thresholding mechanism in [21], [22], where transmissions are inhibited when the sensed attribute is not significant or not significantly different from what sensed/transmitted in the past, thereby reducing the transmission/relaying activity of nodes.”
- CHEF: Cluster Head Election mechanism using Fuzzy logic in Wireless Sensor Networks (2008, background): “One kind of the famous routing algorithms to achieve the energy efficiency is cluster routing[2][9].”
- APTEEN: a hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless (2002, methodology): “In this scheme the nodes react immediately to sudden changes in the value of a sensed attribute beyond a pre-determined threshold value and are well suited for time critical applications as used in TEEN [12].”
- Clustering in sensor networks: A literature survey (2014, methodology): “Threshold sensitive Energy Efficient sensor Network protocol (TEEN): TEEN (Manjeshwar and Agrawal, 2001) is a threshold-based”
- A survey of security issues in mobile ad hoc and sensor networks (2005, background): “Several routing protocols in sensor networks, such as directed diffusion [97], LEACH [99], and TEEN [104], are vulnerable to this class of attack, which may be very critical, especially when Hello packets consist of routing data or localization information exchange.”
- A Survey on Clustering Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks (2010, methodology): “algorithms have been proposed to improve LEACH, such as PEGASIS [10], TEEN [11], APTEEN [12], MECH [18], LEACH-C [19] EEPSC [20] etc.”
- Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey (2004, background): “…Energy E–cient Protocols (TEEN and APTEEN): Two hierarchical routing protocols called TEEN (Threshold-sensitive Energy E–cient sensor Network protocol), and APTEEN (Adaptive Periodic Threshold-sensitive Energy E–cient sensor Network protocol) are proposed in [8] and [9], respectively.”
- Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: attacks and countermeasures (2003, neutral): “Other clustering protocols [40] and protocols optimizing or extending LEACH such as TEEN [41] and PEGASIS [42] are also susceptible to attacks similar to those described above.”
- A Survey on Clustering Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (2012, methodology): “…[25], Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS) [26], Threshold sensitive Energy Efficient sensor Network protocol (TEEN) [27], The Adaptive Threshold sensitive Energy Efficient sensor Network protocol (APTEEN) [28], Two-Tier Data Dissemination (TTDD) [29], Concentric…”
- Group-Based Trust Management Scheme for Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks (2009, neutral): “Ç”
- Efficient broadcasting protocols for regular wireless sensor networks (2003, methodology): “To improve LEACH’s work, in TEEN’s protocol [10], each sensor node will decide whether it should transmit the data or not according to the variation of the collecting information and thus conserve more power.”
- Exploiting Sink Mobility for Maximizing Sensor Networks Lifetime (2005, methodology): “Previous research aimed toward this major goal has been prevalently concerned with developing techniques for topology control [2], [3], energy efficient MAC [4] and routing [5], [6].”
- A Survey on Routing Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks (2011, background): “There are also plenty of routing protocols in this hierarchical family, such as Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH [9]), Threshold-Sensitive Energy Efficient Sensor Network Protocol (TEEN [10]), Minimum Energy Communication Network (MECN [11]), Self-Organizing Protocol (SOP [12]), Senso”
- Multipath Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks: Survey and Research Challenges (2012, background): “Several routing protocols such as Threshold-Sensitive Energy-Efficient Sensor Network Protocol (TEEN) [19], Adaptive Periodic Threshold-Sensitive Energy-Efficient Sensor Network Protocol (APTEEN) [20], Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH) [21], Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor Informa”
- Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey (2013, methodology): “Also, TEEN outperforms LEACH and LEACH-C in terms of energy ef fi ciency [64].”
- A Survey on Successors of LEACH Protocol (2017, methodology): “[14] A. Manjeshwar and D. P. Agrawal, ‘‘TEEN: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks,’’ in Proc.”