Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience.
By Oddgeir Friborg, M. Martinussen, Jan Rosenvinge. 2006
278 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f592cd9537169a9ddbb54764c666488a31147354
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Odin Hjemdal
- P. Fossion
- Oddgeir Friborg
- S. Braun
- Paul Linkowski
- C. Kempenaers
- Norashidah Hashim
- I. Salisu
In Clinical Psychology
- Odin Hjemdal
- P. Fossion
- Oddgeir Friborg
- S. Braun
- Paul Linkowski
- C. Kempenaers
- Norashidah Hashim
- I. Salisu
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The Resilience Scale for Adults: Construct Validity and Measurement in a Belgian Sample (2011, background): “Higher RSA scores have been found to be associated with a healthy Bigfive personality profile (Friborg et al., 2005) as well as less subjective reports of stress and pain in an experimental study of pain (Friborg et al., 2006).”
- Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots (2009, background): “However, a semantic differential format may effectively reduce acquiescence bias without lowering psychometric quality [15].”