The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia-Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+
By C. Barr, J. Sayer. 2012
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f584f5a2aa475bea5a1b8d3b4eea4bd6766e6139
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Global and Planetary Change
- Adeniyi P. Asiyanbi
- John A. Stanturf
- Hugh P. Possingham
- Peter J. Mumby
- Brian Palik
- B. Cashore
- C. Lovelock
- J. Sayer
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function (2014, background): “Other aspects of social context that affect restoration include tenure and use rights (ownership versus use rights, de jure as opposed to de facto), participation by those affected (including Prior Informed Consent; Barr and Sayer, 2012), and the social capital available (including administrative ca”
- The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration. (2015, background): “…in developing countries, corruption and fraud often afflicts restoration projects in those countries, and there is an urgent need to reform financial governance to foster investor’s confidence in conservation efforts and help alleviate poverty among local communities (Barr and Sayer 2012).”
- Oil palm expansion transforms tropical landscapes and livelihoods (2012, background): “It is also often planted by large corporations, some of whom pay little heed to the rights of local populations (Barr and Sayer, 2012).”
- Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. (2012, background): “Many scholars have emphasized the importance of clarifying and strengthening the land and carbon tenure rights of local communities as central to successful REDD+ [38– 41,31,42].”
- A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River (2016, background): “Increasingly, critical scholars show how REDD+ might, in fact, be reversing historical gains in decentralisation and devolution of control over forest resources (Barr and Sayer, 2012; Leach and Scoones, 2015; Phelps et al., 2010).”
- Impacts of large‐scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know (2016, background): “Although many are optimistic about the outcomes from FLR approach and its effects on local livelihoods, only recently have large-scale reforestation and restoration initiatives began to be evaluated (Chazdon 2008, Coomes et al. 2008, Barr & Sayer 2012, Blignaut et al. 2013).”