Past Visits and the Intention to Revisit a Destination: Place Attachment as the Mediator and Novelty Seeking as the Moderator

By Babu George, Bibin P. George. 2012

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f54a4df47b4c1da34b84e2cf7f7b4177e37b1416

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists (2017, background): “Finally, in line with previous studies (e.g. George & George, 2004; Gitelson & Crompton, 1984; Lee & Shen, 2013; Neuvonen et al., 2010; Prayag & Ryan, 2012; Ryan, 1995), PA also has a direct effect on tourists’ intention to revisit a destination, highlighting the role of tourists’ emotional bond…”
Destination loyalty explained through place attachment, destination familiarity and destination image (2020, background): “Considering that this study is exclusively focusing on repeat visitors, and previous visitation is known to have a positive relationship with place attachment (e.g., George & George, 2004), the latter is also explored in the next section to offer rich insights into tourists' loyalty.”
Moderating Effects of Tourists’ Novelty-Seeking Tendencies on Destination Image, Visitor Satisfaction, and Short- and Long-Term Revisit Intentions (2013, background): “Novelty-seeking theory provides a strong theoretical foundation in explaining destination choice behavior (Babu and Bibin 2004; Bello and Etzel 1985).”
Antecedents of Tourists’ Loyalty to Mauritius (2012, background): “George and George (2004) suggest that satisfactory experiences at each visit reinforce tourists’ place attachment, thereby affecting future behavior.”
Measuring Tourists’ Emotional Experiences (2015, background): “…both environmental psychology (e.g., Hidalgo and Hernandez 2001; Manzo 2003; Williams and Vaske 2003) and tourism literatures (e.g., George and George 2004; Gross and Brown 2008; Lee, Kyle, and Scott 2012; Tsai 2012; Yuksel, Yuksel, and Bilim 2010): place identity (emotional attachment) and…”
Destination Personality, Affective Image, and Behavioral Intentions in Domestic Urban Tourism (2015, background): “…capture and observe the potential effect past experience has on the formation of emotional images given its inconsistent role in the formation of images and intentions to visit (George and George 2004; Huang and Hsu 2009; Kaplanidou 2007; Petrick, Morais, and Norman 2001; Shen and Wyer Jr. 2010).”
Examining the effect of novelty seeking, satisfaction, and destination image on tourists' return pattern: A two factor, non-linear latent growth model (2011, background): “Noveltyseeking theory provides a stronger theoretical foundation in explaining destination choice behavior (Babu & Bibin, 2004; Bello & Etzel, 1985; Zuckerman, 1971).”
The mediating role of place attachment between nature connectedness and human well-being: perspectives from Japan (2019, result): “Similar studies do exist which reported the role of place attachment in explaining pro-environmental behaviors through mediation analysis (Halpenny 2010; George and George 2004; Cheng and Wu 2015).”
Emotions elicited by local food consumption, memories, place attachment and behavioural intentions (2017, result): “These results are consistent with those of George (2004) and Kil, Holland, Stein, and Ko (2012), who argued that compared with tourists with a lower place attachment to tourist destinations, those with stronger place attachment exhibit higher intention to revisit or recommend the spot to their…”
Sport Tourists’ Involvement with a Destination (2013, background): “In the tourism context, place attachment is a well-established construct used to reflect an individual’s commitment and predict place loyalty and satisfaction (George & George, 2004, Yuksel, Yuksel, & Bilim, 2010).”