Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries.

By S. Bhattacharya, P. Salam. 2002

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Win-win scenarios at the climate–development interface: Challenges and opportunities for stove replacement programs through carbon finance (2012, unknown): “…in consumption of non-renewable biomass, contributing to multiple benefits associated with forest conservation, energy expenditures and time spent gathering wood from increasingly distant locales (Bhattacharya and Salam, 2002; Limmeechokchai and Chawana, 2007; Mann, 2007; Sagar and Kartha, 2007).”
Energy consumption during cooking in the residential sector of developed nations: A review (2013, unknown): “2) (Ramanathan and Ganesh, 1994; Bhattacharya and Salam, 2002; Kurchania et al., 2010; Chandra et al., 1991 ).”
Socio-economic hurdles to widespread adoption of small-scale biogas digesters in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review (2014, background): “serious health problems due to exposure to smoke [3].”
Demand for cooking fuels in a developing country: To what extent do taste and preferences matter? (2011, methodology): “The first-order conditions of equation (4) with respect to k and x are given by equations (5) and (6) respectively: ∂ ∂k = ∂u(fi(.”