Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector

By D. Burtraw, Alan Krupnick, Karen L. Palmer, Anthony Paul, Michael A. Toman, C. Bloyd. 2003

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f503bd51db8a9a5ead6fe6888d2674008b225601

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Air pollution policy in Europe: Quantifying the interaction with greenhouse gases and climate change policies (2014, background): “On the other hand, it is widely recognized that policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions yield co-benefits in reducing emissions of air pollutants (Rive, 2010; Burtraw et al., 2003; Syri et al., 2001).”
Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking (2010, background): “32 Bussolo and O’Connor (2001) India All n.e. n.e. n.e. 33 O’Connor et al (2003) China All n.e. n.e. n.e. 34 Dessus and O’Connor (2003) Chile All n.e. n.e. n.e. 35 Aunan et al (2004) China Electric 36 n.e. n.e. 36 Aunan et al (2004) China Electric 27 n.e. n.e. 37 Aunan et al (2004) China Electric 36”
Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation (2010, background): “Still, many climate policies produce ancillary environmental benefits, i.e. reduced emissions of other pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and mercury that have more local impact (Burtraw, et al. 2003).”
The Effect of Pollution on Labor Supply: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Mexico City (2011, methodology): “In Column 2, we present the coefficient estimate of θ1 from Equation (6).”
Climate policy and ancillary benefits: A survey and integration into the modelling of international negotiations on climate change (2008, background): “…benefits assessments are probably attributable to several other factors, e.g. the more aggregate level of modelling in the European studies (Burtraw et al. 2003: 668; Burtraw and Toman 2000b: 23), high economic valuations of environmental impacts employed by the European researchers…”
Targets for global climate policy: an overview (2013, background): “A non-cooperative equilibrium has higher emissions (Babiker, 2001; Barrett, 1994; Carraro and Siniscalco, 1992, 1993, 1998; Nordhaus and Yang, 1996; Yang, 2003).”
Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective (2007, unknown): “Depending on the stringency of the mitigation level, the source sector, the measure and the monetary value attributed to mortality risks, health benefits range from 30 to 50% of estimated mitigation costs (Burtraw et al., 2003; Proost and Regemorter, 2003) up to a factor of three to four (Aunan et a”
Relationship between Leaf Surface Characteristics and Particle Capturing Capacities of Different Tree Species in Beijing (2017, unknown): “Global industrialization and rapid urbanization have led to an increase in air pollution, which is an urban environmental problem [1,2].”
Climate policy co-benefits: a review (2020, background): “Burtraw et al. (2003) 12–14 USD/tCO2e US, health benefits due to NOx reductions and savings on NOx and SO2 abatement.”