Reconstructing Indian Population History

By David Reich, K. Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L Price, L. Singh. Nature, 2009

1,613 citations recorded by the source corpus.

India has been underrepresented in genome-wide surveys of human variation. We analyse 25 diverse groups in India to provide strong evidence for two ancient populations, genetically divergent, that are ancestral to most Indians today. One, the ‘Ancestral North Indians’ (ANI), is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans, whereas the other, the ‘Ancestral South Indians’ (ASI), is as distinct from ANI and East Asians as they are from each other. By introducing methods that can estimate ancestry without accurate ancestral populations, we show that ANI ancestry ranges from 39–71% in most Indian groups, and is higher in traditionally upper caste and Indo-European speakers. Groups with only ASI ancestry may no longer exist in mainland India. However, the indigenous Andaman Islanders are unique in being ASI-related groups without ANI ancestry. Allele frequency differences between groups in India are larger than in Europe, reflecting strong founder effects whose signatures have been maintained for thousands of years owing to endogamy. We therefore predict that there will be an excess of recessive diseases in India, which should be possible to screen and map genetically.

Subfields: Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4d74c115306022cda320215f882d906a31742d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Matthew Stephens
  2. J. K. Pritchard
  3. Edward S. Buckler
  4. Alkes L Price
  5. Joseph K. Pickrell
  6. John Novembre
  7. Daniel Falush
  8. Nick Patterson

Citations in the corpus