European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments
By Lynn van Wezemael, Vincenzina Caputo, R. Nayga, George M. Chryssochoidis, Wim Verbeke. 2014
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4ca9a574b98d34e9362282490c187236ec54159
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Economics and Econometrics
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society (2015, background): “The share of one out of five people claiming to be ready to adopt insects contrasts with Vanhonacker et al. (2013) who found only five percent of a sample of consumers with similar socio-demographic characteristics and from the same study region to be definitely willing or willing to eat protein fro”
- Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution (2016, methodology): “…design our DCE, we needed to validate the attributes that should appear in the choice tasks, through a systematic review of academic literature and government reports on meat products and meat consumption (e.g. DEFRA, 2013a; Tubiello et al., 2014; Van Loo et al., 2014; Van Wezemael et al., 2014).”