Clarifying the Hubble constant tension with a Bayesian hierarchical model of the local distance ladder
By S. Feeney, Daniel J. Mortlock, Niccolò Dalmasso. 2017
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Estimates of the Hubble constant, H-0, from the local distance ladder and from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are discrepant at the similar to 3 sigma level, indicating a potential issue wit ...
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4ca4c421a5d22b6f36876bbab6d2b9ba84d6d1c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- S. Vagnozzi
- Risa Wechsler
- Erin Sheldon
- M. White
- Rachel Mandelbaum
- Simon D. M. White
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
- J. Brinkmann
Citations in the corpus
- Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension (2020, unknown): “[200] S.”
- Early Dark Energy can Resolve the Hubble Tension. (2018, background): “This discrepancy is not easily explained by any obvious systematic effect in either measurement [7–10], and so increasing attention is focusing on the possibility that this “Hubble tension” may be indicating new physics beyond the standard ΛCDM cosmological model [11, 12].”
- The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy (2022, unknown): “This result has passed a wide range of null tests and has been replicated from the published Cepheid photometry (33, 34) and the Cepheid photometry has been replicated independently (35).”
- A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant (2021, methodology): “Re-analyses of the results of R16 by various authors (Feeney et al. 2018; Cardona et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017; Follin and Knox 2018; Dhawan et al. 2018) use the same Cepheid photometric reduction data so are not independent as such.”
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data (2017, result): “Our DES+BAO+BBN analysis is also qualitatively similar to the inverse distance-ladder approach presented in Aubourg et al. (2015), though the underlying motivation for the analysis is rather different (an updated analysis was recently presented in Feeney et al. 2018).”
- New physics in light of the H0 tension: An alternative view (2019, result): “[44] S.”
- Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions (2019, unknown): “[29] S.”
- Dark Energy in Light of Multi-Messenger Gravitational-Wave Astronomy (2018, background): “Reanalysis of the local distance ladder with more sophisticated statistical techniques tend to agree on the high value, although with somewhat larger error bars (Cardona et al., 2017; Feeney et al., 2018a).”
- Sounds Discordant: Classical Distance Ladder and ΛCDM-based Determinations of the Cosmological Sound Horizon (2018, result): “A number of independent analyses of the data have served to largely confirm the conclusions of R18 (Efstathiou et al. 2014; Cardona et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017; Feeney et al. 2018; Follin & Knox 2018).”