Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas

By F. Morillo, María Bordons, I. Gómez. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4a33b6b307c470c00e2613ee926af011880c524

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Molecular Biology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures (2009, unknown): “Throughout this section, direct similarity measures that are proportional to each other will simply be regarded as equivalent. and Braun, 1990) or as the Salton index (e.g., Morillo, Bordons, and Gómez, 2003).”
Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. (2007, background): “…[Aram 2004], ‘‘specific body of teachable knowledge’’ [Woollcott 1979], ‘‘conceptual specificity’’ [Robertson, Martin, and Singer 2003], or ‘‘journal sets’’ [Morillo, Bordons, and Gomez 2003]) or by social factors (e.g.,‘‘isolated domains of human experience possessing its own community of…”
Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009, methodology): “2 ), and already used implicitly in previous bibliometric studies on interdisciplinarity (e.g. Morillo et al. 2003).”
The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals (2006, background): “As the interdisciplinarity emerges today as an important aspect of science (e.g. Morillo et al., 2003), the R software and the “adehabitat” package will be of major use to wildlife biometricians who are concerned by the use of space and habitat selection by animals.”
Algorithmic stemmers or morphological analysisq An evaluation (2009, methodology): “Morillo et al. (2001 and 2003) used co-classifications of the ISI Subject Categories as”
On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact (2009, unknown): “We show that, although for all disciplines combined there is no clear correlation between the level of interdisciplinarity of papers and their citation rates, there are nonetheless some disciplines in which a higher level of interdisciplinarity is related to a higher citation rates.”
Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals (2007, methodology): “Like most research in the bibliometric field, these analyses of interdisciplinarity were based on the assumption that journals can be grouped either using the ISI subject categories (e.g., Leeuwen & Tijssen, 2000; Morillo et al., 2003) or on the basis of clustering citation matrices (Doreian & Farra”
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (2004, unknown): “National Science Board. (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators –2002.”