The Opposite of Learning: Ossification in the Climate Change Regime

By J. Depledge. Global Environmental Politics, 2006

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f49e639af367116c59e98185fb4bb266d67a1b16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. A. Fletcher
2. Shahzad Ansari
3. Frank Wijen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. A. Fletcher
2. A. Gouldson
3. Shahzad Ansari
4. Frank Wijen
5. S. Oberthür
6. W. Hare

Citations in the corpus

• Clearing the air: the contribution of frame analysis to understanding climate policy in the United States (2009, background): “Though the USA was not solely responsible for the failure of the Kyoto Protocol as either a frame or a set of public climate initiatives, Depledge ( 2006 , p.”
• The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective (2010, background): “This is not, however, to argue against reform of the UNFCCC process, which is badly needed (Depledge, 2006; Yamin and Depledge, 2010).”
• Overcoming Inaction through Collective Institutional Entrepreneurship: Insights from Regime Theory (2007, background): “Formal global climate policy has thus become increasingly institutionalized (Depledge 2006; Hovi et al. 2003).”
• Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? (2012, unknown): “See, for example, Depledge 2006.”
• Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future? (2017, background): “The climate change regime has gradually evolved into a prime example of an ossifying process that continuously receives new technical or scientific input but consistently fails to act on it.(125,126) Arguing in favor of substituting”