The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective

By W. Hare, C. Stockwell, C. Flachsland, S. Oberthür. 2010

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8813796293739c1b06fa89689fd93dc39edac3ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. O. Geden
2. Marcel J. Dorsch
3. C. Flachsland

In Global and Planetary Change

1. O. Geden
2. Marcel J. Dorsch
3. C. Flachsland

Citations in the corpus

• A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance (2017, background): “…almost three decades, classical top-down approaches have emphasized the global character of the climate change problem and identified international multilateralism, seen as cooperative effort between nation-states, as the central and most appropriate forum for climate governance (Hare et al. 2010).”
• The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking (2016, background): “5 C), from which all further steps are rigorously derived.(22,23) While the top-down paradigm has not been abandoned as a political ideal, it is effectively being eroded and replaced by the more practical bottom-up approach.”