Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence

By L. Betzig. 2012

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f495c06eea1cebce4d277f716ba5d1ee105118a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Steve Stewart-Williams
2. Andrew G. Thomas
3. L. Halsey

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Steve Stewart-Williams
2. Andrew G. Thomas
3. L. Halsey

Citations in the corpus

• The Ape That Thought It Was a Peacock: Does Evolutionary Psychology Exaggerate Human Sex Differences? (2013, background): “On the one hand, Brown, Laland, and Borgerhoff Mulder (2009) have shown that, averaging across groups, the sex difference in reproductive variability is relatively small, with some societies showing no difference at all (see also Betzig, 2012).”
• Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? (2020, background): “Nonetheless, genetic and anthropological data strongly suggest that there is such a difference (Betzig, 2012; Labuda et al., 2010; summarized in M. L. Wilson et al., 2017, Table 1).”