CALCULATING ENERGY-RELATED CO2 EMISSIONS EMBODIED IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE USING A GLOBAL INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL
By K. Wiebe, M. Bruckner, S. Giljum, Christian M. Lutz. 2012
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3f35bfdc0e5fe4ceee9c374e626788932c7fc24
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Manfred Lenzen
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- E. Dietzenbacher
- Richard Wood
- B. Los
- K. Wiebe
- G. D. de Vries
- M. Timmer
In Environmental Engineering
- Manfred Lenzen
- Richard Wood
- E. Dietzenbacher
- Arnold Tukker
- S. Giljum
- Daniel Moran
- K. Wiebe
- Keiichiro Kanemoto
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- E. Dietzenbacher
- Arnold Tukker
- Manfred Lenzen
- Daniel Moran
- Richard Wood
- Arne Geschke
- K. Wiebe
- Keiichiro Kanemoto
Citations in the corpus
- To RAS or not to RAS? What is the difference in outcomes in multi-regional input–output models? (2016, methodology): “This, however, results in output and valueadded data that diverge from the original data, see Appendix B in Wiebe et al. (2012).”
- Tracing CO2 emissions in global value chains (2018, unknown): “…collectively have higher consumption-based emissions than territory-based emissions, meaning that they are net importers of emissions and thereby benefit from environmentally intensive production abroad (Davis and Caldeira 2010; Peters et al. 2011; Wiebe et al. 2012; Arto and Dietzenbacher 2014).”
- What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian Countries (2016, methodology): “Wiebe et al. (2012) using consumption-based approach to emission found that the net imports of OECD (developed) countries increased by 80% between 1995 and 2005 while the net exports of BRICSA and non-OECD countries increased for the same period of time therefore supporting the Pollution Haven…”
- EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi‐Regional Input‐Output Tables (2018, background): “A similar drawback of limited sector detail exists for Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) InterCountry Input-Output Database (ICIO) (Wiebe and Yamano 2016) and the related Global Resource Accounting Model (GRAM) global EE MRIO model (Wiebe et al. 2012).”
- How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? (2018, background): “…effects on environmental degradation for individual countries varies by income, possibly due to policy differences, economic structure, level of economic openness, and country-specific variations (Baek et al., 2009; Wiebe et al., 2012; Mudakkar et al., 2013; Ozturk, 2015; Khan et al., 2016).”
- BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION (2013, background): “This means that in a real MRIO table, either balancing conditions must be violated or raw data misrepresented (compare with Wiebe et al., 2012).”
- THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT (2013, background): “See also Oosterhaven et al. (2008) on the Asian International IOTs project, Wang et al. (2010) on a project at the US International Trade Commission and Wiebe et al. (2012) on the Global Resource Accounting Model project.”
- GLOBAL MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT FRAMEWORKS: AN INTRODUCTION AND OUTLOOK (2013, methodology): “…researchers started to use existing collections of national IOTs and aggregated trade data to estimate GMRIO tables (see Ahmad and Wyckoff, 2003; Wiebe et al., 2012a; 2012b, which are based on the OECD database, and Peters and Hertwich, 2008; Hertwich and Peters, 2009; Wilting and Vringer,…”
- Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels (2016, background): “…degradation from individual countries varies according to their income levels, and this may be due to differences in policy, economic structure, level of economic openness and country-specific variables (Baek et al., 2009; Naranpanawa, 2011; Wiebe et al., 2012; Forslid and Okubo, 2014).”
- Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives (2017, background): “For example, some studies include carbon, water, and ecological land footprints of households [107,108], consumption and production [85,109], international trade [110], transportation [111], and nations [112,113].”